Skip to comments.
Soak the Trial Lawyers: Kyl, Cornyn Propose that Tobacco-Suit Lawyers Return Exorbitant Fees
Human Events ^
| Week of May 5, 2003
| Stephen Moore
Posted on 05/03/2003 1:29:17 PM PDT by Jean S
This is a story of one of the greatest heists in modern American history. It is a story of how billions of dollars were transferred from taxpayers to a small group of avaricious trial lawyers.
Five years ago these trial lawyers became fabulously wealthy off of other peoples pain and sufferingand they did it with impunity.
That is, hopefully, until now. I am referring to the 1998 tobacco litigation agreement reached between states and tobacco companies. This famous legal settlement required the tobacco companies to reimburse states nearly $250 billion over 25 years for the smoking-related health care costs incurred by state-financed Medicaid programs.
Here is where the highway robbery is involved. In that deal, a small gang of several hundred trial lawyers walked off with settlement money of an estimated $10 to $15 billion. If you filled Madison Square Garden three-fourths of the way with millionairs, their total wealth would be just slightly less than what the trial lawyers received in these settlements.
$50,000 An Hour
And so, as it turns out, the grand winner from these tobacco settlement cases was not the smoker who got cancer or heart disease. It was not the ailing smokers families. It was not taxpayers. It was not states and cities, which bore the health costs. It was trial lawyersabout 500 of them.
Some trial lawyers received fees of more than $50,000 an hour in contingency fees for lawsuits that never even went to court. Never before have so many billionaires been created for doing so little. In the past five years they have bought luxury yachts, Rolls Royce autos, Citation jet planes, and politicians (through millions of dollars of campaign contributions). In 2002 the trial lawyers were the second-largest giver to Democratic candidates.
These fees were outrageously excessive, fumes Michael Horowitz, a legal expert at the Hudson Institute. This money should have gone to states, not to make billionaires out of lawyers.
Hes right: in a sane world, these funds should have been used to develop new treatments for cancer; they should have been used for anti-smoking campaigns; they should have been used to help balance state budgets. The trial lawyers have acted no less greedily or dishonorably than the tobacco firms, which tried to hide the health consequences of smoking.
But this grotesque story of lawyer abuse may have a happy ending after all. Last month, two courageous SenatorsJon Kyl of Arizona and John Cornyn of Texasdecided to take on the trial bar by demanding that a good chunk of the tobacco settlement lawyer fees be returned to states from whom it was pilfered. Kyl and Cornyn have discovered that the multi-billion-dollar settlements awarded the trial lawyers violate legal ethics rules.
Under decades of legal precedent, lawyers are prohibited from receiving fees that are excessive or unreasonable. If there were ever a case of unreasonable fees it is this one. As a Missouri court has ruled: Reasonableness is an implied term in every contract for attorneys fees.
Here is what Kyl and Cornyn propose. If a reasonable fee of $400 an hour were to be applied, and if the tobacco lawyers were permitted to receive settlement money that paid them a contingency fee of even five times that amount (i.e. $2,000 an hour in fees), the states will be able to recapture a net present value of an estimated $9 billion from the tobacco lawyers. And that is money that many indebted states can use to help balance their budgets.
Kudos to Kyl and Cornyn. They are trying to right an egregious wrong. They have come up with a formula in which everyone wins. States win because they get $9 billion which can be used to avoid tax hikes. Children win because some of this money will be used for anti-smoking campaigns to educate school kids on the dangers of smoking.
And trial lawyers still win a jackpotjust one that will make most of them millionaires, rather than hundred-millionaires and in some cases billionaires. They will still receive fees that will pay them more for an hours work than many Americans earn in a month.
And for this they will moan and complain about the injustice of it all. This will be a wonderful test of the priorities of the Democrats in Congress, who are largely funded with trial lawyer dollars. Will they side with states and cities and children and cancer patients? Or will they side with their millionaire benefactors and their mountainous bag of campaign contributions?
To ask the question is to answer it.
Mr. Moore is economics correspondent for Human Events and president of the Club for Growth.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: andscorpions; pufflist; tobacco; tobaccolawsuits
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
05/03/2003 1:29:17 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: JeanS
Teapot Dome Scancal II. With Clinton and the State Extortionist Generals at the helm.
2
posted on
05/03/2003 1:34:20 PM PDT
by
microgood
(They will all die......most of them.)
To: JeanS
tee hee
To: JeanS
Or will they side with their millionaire benefactors and their mountainous bag of campaign contributions? This is another one of those retorical questions, right?
4
posted on
05/03/2003 1:39:39 PM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: *puff_list; SheLion; madfly
To: JeanS
Scruggs, a lawyer from Pascagoula, Mississippi, made $9 billion dollars from the tobacco settlement. He is Trent Lott's brother in law. It seems just recently that the state found out that the Judges that ruled on the suit had their mortgages and debts paid by the lawyers representing Mississippi selected by Mississippi's Attorney General, Mike Moore. Mississippi was the first state to prosecute the tobacco suit successfully. This Tobacco settlement was a dirty deal for the tobacco companies and the taxpayers. Thievery plain and simple, lawyer style.
To: JeanS
Hes right: in a sane world, these funds should have been used...for anti-smoking campaigns; they should have been used to help balance state budgets. The trial lawyers have acted no less greedily or dishonorably than the tobacco firms, which tried to hide the health consequences of smoking.
No, in a sane world the money would have remained with Phillip Morris and not confiscated or extorted to "balance state budgets." He also should have said: The trial lawyers have acted no less greedily than state governments.
7
posted on
05/03/2003 1:54:11 PM PDT
by
Fraulein
To: JeanS
If these gigantic awards to trial lawyers are not stopped, a relative handful of these lawyers will be able to outspend all other sources of campaign contributions and issue-advocacy combined. The entire amount spent on all campaigns, by all parties, at all levels of government in 2002 was less than half of what just one of these lawyers received in fees from a tobacco settlement. These guys are going to be able to literally buy themselves the next government, and the winners will all be fine, upstanding, trial-lawyer-supporting Democrats. Having tasted tobacco-industry blood, the lawyers are now after anything with money... Microsoft, McDonalds, gun manufacturers, they don't care. If it has money, they want to crack it open and suck it dry. Please do all you can to support this law. You want tort reform? This is it. Take the money out of it, the vast billions that are in it today for anyone who wins the "legal lotto," and a whole lot of this Lawsuit Madness will dry up all by itself. |
8
posted on
05/03/2003 2:00:00 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
To: Fraulein
You are RIGHT! My husband has worked at Dow Chemical for 30 years as a chemical engineer. We never made asbestos. Dow never made the stuff. But we bought Union Carbide several years ago and THEY used to make asbestos. So Dow is being sued for millions or billions in asbestos suits. You know the lawyers will line their pockets with cash and the sick people won't get piddly squat. Dow shouldn't be having to pay this. Dow is already suffering from recession after 9/11, high cost of oil, etc. Our project was cancelled in Nov. Dow is strapped for cash, yet we are having to pay out big bucks to the trial lawyers for asbestos poisoning, and we never made the stuff. We also never made silicone breast implants, but long ago we bought Corning, and that co. became Dow Corning - so we paid something like 5 billion$ in that settlement. A year after we agreed to pay that 5 billion$ medical studies came out that proved that the silicone wasn't causing all the health problems being blamed on them -- that in addition to the fact that we were sued for something we never made. It is a lawsuit crazy world! My sister has MS, and all kind of auto immune problems, my mother in law had cancer and lupus, I have rheumatoid arthritis, which is auto immune problem, both my sisters and I have thyroid problems, caused by auto immune problem.... overactive immune system attacked our thyroid glands.... NONE OF US EVER HAD SILICONE implants! If we had, we could have blamed our illnesses on the implants. And it would not have been the fault of implants! It is just such a lawsuit crazy world.
9
posted on
05/03/2003 2:06:45 PM PDT
by
buffyt
(Can you say President Hillary, Mistress of Darkness? Me Neither!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Nick Danger
And suing big tobacco made no more sense than suing McDonald's or big sugar... No one forced these "victims" to smoke, over eat, or cram sugar down their lazy throats. Every one knew all of those things were bad for them. I knew in 4th grade that smoking was harmful, that was 1960, and my dad stopped smoking then. He said it was unhealthy and expensive and he had three kids to feet so he stopped smoking. And he was a cigar salesman! But it is easier to indulge in harmful activities then look for someone to sue. I get so angry at the big fat greedy trail lawyers...
10
posted on
05/03/2003 2:09:43 PM PDT
by
buffyt
(Can you say President Hillary, Mistress of Darkness? Me Neither!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: JeanS
The government should stay out of regulating wages. No minimum wages no maximum wages. If the lawyers got what was agreed to, then they get to keept it. Or is there a big brother who will redistribute income as he sees fit? How about Bill Gates? He should give back a whole bunch for selling crap that doesn't work or if it does, doesn't work very wsell. Like his spellchedrek I am ussing.
11
posted on
05/03/2003 2:25:50 PM PDT
by
RWG
To: RWG
re: The government should stay out of regulating wages. )))
You're right, but these are not wages. They are forcible confiscations, courtesy of a corrupt court. I hope Kyl and Cronyn can do something about it, but I doubt it.
Hillary Clinton's brother got some of this tobacco windfall.
12
posted on
05/03/2003 2:33:22 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: RWG
Actually, jackbooted thugs representing the various state governments stood ready to move in and physically confiscate the assets of the losers in the lawsuits.
The same jackbooted thugs work on behalf of the trial court judges to make sure the lawyers get a piece of the action.
There were neither wages nor taxes involved.
13
posted on
05/03/2003 2:40:34 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: RWG
I disagree. We won't have liberty until judges and lawyers have to live under the same laws as the rest of us do. Courts would find any contract any of us normal folk enters into would have to be reasonable. Under that same contract law, attorneys fees have to be reasonable, too.
Sue a lawyer for liberty!
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Try to sue a lawyer for incompetance or misrepresenting you. I had a lawyer represent my former wife in a divorce that was also my business' lawyer, an obvious breach of ethics. When I contacted the Bar about the conflict of interest, they sent me mountains of paperwork that would take a lawyer and a lawyer's aide a year to fill out. Lawyers will not sue other lawyers unless they are pinned back by the ears. OTOH, to file a complaint against a Medical Doctor or a medical professional you just whisper it to a lawyer and one will immediately get help.
To: JeanS
Who smokes these days?
Answer: single girls/women and minorities. Exploitation of the most vulnerable elements in society by an out of control, unregulated, utterly evil lawyer industry.
The "tobacco settlement" is the most finacially corrupt misuse of our pathetic excuse of a legal system in all of human history.
16
posted on
05/03/2003 3:34:39 PM PDT
by
friendly
To: JeanS
bttt
17
posted on
05/03/2003 3:56:48 PM PDT
by
friendly
To: friendly
IMHO - Any state that spent the settlement money on anything other than what was specified in the agreement should also be sued. The was a shake down of the highest degree. The country will pay for this greedy event for years.
To: Dutch Boy
A microscopic pittance of the "tobacco settlement" is spent by the states on health care or nicotine cessation efforts, the grounds on which the states were awarded this money in the first place (alleged increased Medicaid costs).
In many states it is $0, nada, zilch.
And the evil lawyer industry? Complete corruption in its purest form. Our "legal system" is essentally a vast money making machine for a sinister enterprise.
The American lawyer industry is without question, the most financially successful criminal enterprise in all of human history.
19
posted on
05/03/2003 4:20:55 PM PDT
by
friendly
To: Dutch Boy
Any state that spent the settlement money on anything other than what was specified in the agreement should also be sued.My understanding is that very little has been spent on health care. Correct me if I'm wrong, it appears that very little, if any, accountability has governed the way these funds have been spent.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson